'Radiation Belt Remediation' Plan Could Affect HF
Propagation:from The ARRL Letter,
Vol 25, No 33
Website: http://www.arrl.org/on August 18, 2006
View
comments about this article!
'Radiation Belt Remediation' Plan Could Affect HF
Propagation, Study Suggests:
A New Zealand university research group believes a US
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) "Radiation
Belt Remediation" (RBR) plan could cause major worldwide
disruptions to HF radio communication and GPS navigation.
DARPA reportedly envisions RBR as a way to protect low-Earth
orbiting (LEO) satellites from damage caused by severe solar
storms or even from high-altitude nuclear detonations. The New
Zealand-based research group suggests, however, that
policymakers need to carefully consider the implications of
the project. Headed by Craig Rodger of the University of Otago
Physics Department, the research group says RBR could
significantly affect radio propagation from several days to a
week or longer.
"We've calculated that Earth's upper atmosphere would be
dramatically affected by such a system, causing unusually
intense HF blackouts around most of the world," Rodger said.
"Airplane pilots and ships would lose radio contact, and some
Pacific Island nations could be isolated for as long as six to
seven days, depending on the system's design and how it was
operated." GPS would likely also be disrupted on a large
scale, he added.
System tests would employ extremely high-intensity, very
low frequency (VLF) radio waves to "flush" particles from
radiation belts and dump them into the upper atmosphere. The
disruptions would result from the deluge of dumped charged
particles temporarily changing the ionosphere from a "mirror"
that bounces HF radio waves around the planet to a "sponge"
that soaks them up, Rodger explains.
The group's paper, "The atmospheric implications of
radiation belt remediation" http://www.physics.otago.ac.nz/research/space/ag-24-2025.pdf,
appears in the August edition of the international journal
Annales Geophysicae. University of Otago researchers
collaborated with UK and Finnish scientists in its
preparation.
ARRL Propagation Report Editor Tad Cook, K7RA, contacted
Rodger to learn more about the RBR proposal. Rodger told him
that RBR "is a serious project, that 'money is starting to
appear to investigate it in more detail,' and 'US scientists
with military connections are treating it seriously'," Cook
said.
Unclassified US Department of Defense budget documents from
earlier this year have proposed using Alaska's High Frequency
Active Auroral Research Project (HAARP) "to exploit emerging
ionosphere and radio science technologies related to advanced
defense applications." HAARP is jointly operated by the US Air
Force and the US Navy. The project appears to be included
under a program called "Sleight of HAND" (SoH).
"The effects of High Altitude Nuclear Detonations (HAND)
are catastrophic to satellites," the budget report explains.
"HAND-generated charged particles are trapped for very long
periods of time, oscillating between the earth's north and
south magnetic poles. This enhanced radiation environment
would immediately degrade low-earth orbiting (LEO) spacecraft
capability and result in their destruction in a short period
of time."
The military budget documents refer to the SoH program as
"a proof of concept demonstration" of technology and
techniques to mitigate the HAND-enhanced trapped radiation,
with the goal of accelerating "the rate of decay of trapped
radiation from the LEO environment by a factor of 10 over the
natural rate of decay."
Source:
The ARRL Letter Vol. 25, No. 33 August 18, 2006
Add A
Comment
| We have one and only one
ionosphere. |
Reply
|
| by AI2IA
on August 18, 2006 |
Mail
this to a friend! |
"Unclassified US Department of Defense
budget documents from earlier this year have proposed
using Alaska's High Frequency Active Auroral Research
Project (HAARP) "to exploit emerging ionosphere and
radio science technologies related to advanced defense
applications." HAARP is jointly operated by the US Air
Force and the US Navy. The project appears to be
included under a program called "Sleight of HAND"
(SoH)."
I think that the time has come for all
hams to review the abundant material available on
Project HAARP. It is convenient to experiment on a few
white mice when thousands of them are available. It is
convenient to experiment on monkeys when you can
purchase hundreds of them for research. We have one and
only one ionosphere. Mess this one up and we all could
regret it. The general public should have a decisive say
on this, but the job of the media is always to
marginalize the general public. Who will be held
responsible if anything goes seriously wrong? A
committee? Keep your eye on this one. |
| |
| RE: We have one and only one
ionosphere. |
Reply
|
| by K0RFD
on August 18, 2006 |
Mail
this to a friend! |
I trust the public implicitly.
But
I'd have to give the government the advantage here. It's
too complicated and too easy to bullshit people.
We do have only one ionosphere. And the
government shouldn't mess with it.
Then again,
if you read the Bill of Rights, there's a lot of other
stuff the government shouldn't be messing with either,
and they're successfully getting away with it.
Good luck. |
| |
| 'Radiation Belt Remediation' Plan
Could Affect HF |
Reply
|
| by W1YW on
August 18, 2006 |
Mail
this to a friend! |
I think it's time the ARRL STOPPED being
alarmist and activist. And that selected hams STOPPED
getting suckered in.
Those so qualified should
read the paper AND the DARPA comments.
Essentially, the gist is that IF AN ATOMIC BLAST
is detonated in the the upper atmosphere (no not
mesophere), HAARP MAY be used to quench some of the
charged particle barrage. The effect would be temporary
but real in extending D region absorption--which usually
affects LF and MF--to HF and even low VHF. On the good
side, the destruction of LEO's from increased drag and
charged particle bombardment would be lessoned fairly
dramatically. Essentially the report discusses using
HAARP as a countermeasure.
Now: Selected Boys
and Girls. LISTEN UP.
If someone blasts a nuke
in this manner the issue is HARDLY ham radio skip at HF.
In that case, The United States is at war. Big time. And
you'll probably be shut down. Period.
So cut
this Art Bell conspiracy baloney and get real for once.
OK?
You should be GRATEFUL that HAARP--AS A
SCIENTIFIC TOOL-- also has some defensive advantages. I
am very happy to see this.
The ARRL has acted
irresponsibly by posting this as their LEAD NEWS ITEM
'FOR ALL AMATEURS' the previous two days. Only LATE
today was it dumped to the bottom of the heap on the web
page.
I am an ARRL member and I a ripped mad
that MY ORGANIZATION has been so alarmist and made fools
of the ham community.
SHAME!
Chip W1YW
|
| |
| Many research tools, but just one
ionosphere. |
Reply
|
| by AI2IA
on August 18, 2006 |
Mail
this to a friend! |
| So far, I see no alarmism, only advocacy
for caution and watchfulness. Having worked all my life
in the military-defense establishment, I am not
suggesting a conspiracy. Why drive the issue to an
extreme? I have never known of the military-defense
establishment ever, ever contracting for a "tool" and
then not using it at least several times. Remember the
flying wing? Well, they flew it at least several times
before discarding it. I am not anti-military-defense. My
pension comes from there. Experts are the last group of
people you ever want to trust with a decision that
affects everyone. Who let the killer bees out? What is
wrong with educating yourself on the nature of HAARP? If
you are a man, then nothing that concerns mankind should
be foreign to your interest. One ionosphere - keep an
eye on what is going on, and make yourself heard. |
| |
| 'Radiation Belt Remediation' Plan
Could Affect HF |
Reply
|
| by W1YW on
August 18, 2006 |
Mail
this to a friend! |
OM--
What the heck is there to
AD-VO-CATE? Killing HAARP? Gimme a break!
The D
Region as a national Park?
Wanna know what
happens to National Parks? We let the worst case
scenarios happen: Yellowstone looks like cross between
the Tunguska event and a Christmas tree farm; Glacier
looks like a typical Boston neighborhood in the
80's--selectively gutted by fire. Grand Canyon is a
common smoke-bowl for 'controlled burn'.
In
comparison the D region will always be pristine...
better OFF than a NP!
If hams attack HAARP
because of this report, I will gladly make public
efforts to deride--based upon fact--those who take such
untenable positions that are contrary to the missions of
Part 97.
73,
Chip W1YW |
| |
| 'Radiation Belt Remediation' Plan
Could Affect HF |
Reply
|
| by KD7OED
on August 18, 2006 |
Mail
this to a friend! |
I'm not sure how the ARRL publishing a
rather factual article qualifies as “alarmist.” My read
of the article indicates that it merely quotes some of
the scientific material and tries to explain it in a
relatively simple fashion that is easy for the majority
of us to understand. The article does have its problems
to be sure, but what one page article on a very complex
subject doesn’t? I have read the paper and it appears to
me that the problem with the article appears to be
merely oversimplification rather than alarmism. The only
major failure I noted was a failure is to explain that
the HF outages associated with Radiation Belt
Remediation (RBR) would be relatively short-lived.
Personally, I would like to thank the ARRL staff for
writing the article and bringing the paper to my
attention, as I found the subject very interesting. I
would also like to point out that there are now a great
number of rougue states that possess the technology to
conduct a High-Altitude Nuclear Explosion (HANE), so it
is by no means certain that the US will be at war after
such an event (after all, we didn’t go to war after all
of the other HANE events referenced in the paper, did
we?). W1YW, we don’t all have advanced degrees in
physics – perhaps your unique skills would be better
served by writing a more comprehensive explanation of
this complex subject instead of just another “bash the
ARRL” rant.
73,
KD7OED
|
| |
| Most Hams can examine issues
objectively. |
Reply
|
| by AI2IA
on August 18, 2006 |
Mail
this to a friend! |
| Most hams can examine technical issues
relating to radio communications objectively. A close
look at Project HAARP will disclose its powerful nature
and attest to why it must be handled responsibly and
monitored by the American public, you know, those wage
earners and working class folks who pay for it. I don't
see why anyone should get emotional over the so-called
"remediation" issue. It is just plain old common sense,
regardless of how someone may want to twist it just to
draw attention to themselves. With that said, I leave
the discussion in the hands of those quite capable of
seeing for themselves the potential for things to go
wrong here. Reading about Project HAARP helps to
increase our understanding and appreciation of our
ionosphere, that is our one and only ionosphere. Handle
with care. |
| |
| 'Radiation Belt Remediation' Plan
Could Affect HF |
Reply
|
| by W1YW on
August 18, 2006 |
Mail
this to a friend! |
The American public is incapable of
monitoring HAARP, Arecibo, The VLA, ATA OR ANY OTHER
LARGE ARRAY.
It is silly to say something like
that.
This whole thing belongs on Art Bell-NOT
the headliner on the ARRL web page--which it HAD until
people complained....
This whole thing has zero
impact on ham radio--and never will.
73,
Chip W1YW |
| |
| RE: 'Radiation Belt Remediation'
Plan Could Affect |
Reply
|
| by NN4RH
on August 19, 2006 |
Mail
this to a friend! |
The ARRL article spins things just enough
to make it seem like it's an attack on ham radio. For
example, omitting mentioning the effects of this are
temporary.
(Tip: Look for one of their monthly
Spectrum Protection fundraising letters in the mail in
the coming days.)
Download the actual subject
article and read it instead - and it's fairly easy to
see that this is not something for hams to get indignant
and aggravated about.
The temporary effect on
ham radio would be comparable to the HF blackouts that
we see occassionally anyway. BFD.
The purpose of
this is as Chip pointed out a countermeasure against
high altitude nuclear explosions damaging low-earth
orbiting satellites (i.e., "spy satellites" if you
prefer that term).
The military activities that
might have to use this thing are not idiots. They will
be aware of the possible damage on HF propagation, which
is very important to the military and government, too.
It would not be used arbitrarily or routinely.
Can't speak for anyone else, but I think it'd be
fair to give up working DX for 9 hours, in exchange for
keeping our satellite intelligence gathering and
surveillance up and running so that the US and our
allies can be protected from those around the world who
want to kill us. |
| |
| 'Radiation Belt Remediation' Plan
Could Affect HF |
Reply
|
| by AB0WR
on August 19, 2006 |
Mail
this to a friend! |
The article would seem to make one glaring
mistake in judgement. It basically states that the ozone
depletion caused by the process would be significant at
low to mid latitudes but that this isn't a big deal
because it is no worse that the natural ozone depletion
that occurs in the polar regions during a major solar
storm.
How did they manage to forget the
difference in population densities between the low to
mid latitudes versus the polar regions?
A ten
day ozone hole over a +/- 30degree band from the equator
would cause significant problems for a large population
world-wide. Not something to shrug off by saying it's no
worse than what happens at the north pole during a solar
storm!
tim ab0wr |
| |
| 'Radiation Belt Remediation' Plan
Could Affect HF |
Reply
|
| by W1YW on
August 19, 2006 |
Mail
this to a friend! |
"I'm not sure how the ARRL publishing a
rather factual article qualifies as “alarmist.” "
-----------------------------------------------
Then you haven't followed what others have
written here.
For TWO DAYS the HEADLINE story on
the ARRL web site was this story.
Only after
they got flack did someone realize, IMO, what a huge
gaff this was.
It ticked a lot of technical
savvy hams off, is my bet.
It was shameful to
project this as a big deal to hams.
SHAME!
Chip W1YW |
| |
| 'Radiation Belt Remediation' Plan
Could Affect HF |
Reply
|
| by W1YW on
August 19, 2006 |
Mail
this to a friend! |
The last HANE event was the Gary Seven
episode on Star Trek, airing 1969.
Before that
the US was doing upper atmosphere testing for EMP. It
was a big, big problem. Almost 50 years ago...
It screwed Telstar.
Look it up. |
| |
| 'Radiation Belt Remediation' Plan
Could Affect HF |
Reply
|
| by W1YW on
August 19, 2006 |
Mail
this to a friend! |
...and now the story has been PULLED from
the main page on the ARRL web site.
From MOST
IMPORTANT to non-existent on the main page--in 24 hours.
What does THAT tell you about the judgement down
in Newington?
As an ARRL member, I am MOST
unhappy that this even got presented as REMOTELY
important.
Of course. I am sure, IMO, some of
you 'conspiracy', Art Bell aficianados will likely now
insist that secret government forces intervened....
Yeh..the HAARP POLICE!
Just call'em
Harpies....
|
| |
| 'Radiation Belt Remediation' Plan
Could Affect HF |
Reply
|
| by W1YW on
August 19, 2006 |
Mail
this to a friend! |
| Just imagine how much better our image
with industry would have been if this had been done
(pulled) with BPL.... |
| |
| RE: 'Radiation Belt Remediation'
Plan Could Affect |
Reply
|
| by K0RFD
on August 19, 2006 |
Mail
this to a friend! |
It hasn't been pulled, it just floated
down to page 2 because they posted a bunch of other
stuff.
Hit the down arrow. |
| |
| 'Radiation Belt Remediation' Plan
Could Affect HF |
Reply
|
| by W1YW on
August 19, 2006 |
Mail
this to a friend! |
...thus confirming that it has ben pulled
from the main page.
I've never seen a HEADLINE
news item pulled from the main page so fast. |
| |
| RE: 'Radiation Belt Remediation'
Plan Could Affect |
Reply
|
| by W9WHE-II
on August 21, 2006 |
Mail
this to a friend! |
"The ARRL article spins things just enough
to make it seem like it's an attack on ham radio. For
example, omitting mentioning the effects of this are
temporary".
TYPICAL ARRL ALARMIST
PROPIGANDA, DESIGNED TO WHIP HAMS INTO A MONEY-DONATING
FRENZY (i.e. arrl's spectrum defense fund) Does this
over-reaction remind you of arrl's over-hyped, "the sky
is falling" alarmist warnings about BPL?
|
| |
| RE: 'Radiation Belt Remediation'
Plan Could Affect |
Reply
|
| by W9WHE-II
on August 21, 2006 |
Mail
this to a friend! |
Why doesn't arrl just send a letter to
DARPA "demanding" that DARPA immeadiately cease and
desist? After-all, we all know how powerfully
influential arrl is with the government!
|
| |
| 'Radiation Belt Remediation' Plan
Could Affect HF |
Reply
|
| by WN3VAW
on August 21, 2006 |
Mail
this to a friend! |
So, let me see if I've got this right:
A New Zealand newspaper publishes an article
discussing a relatively obscure study that proposes to
ionize the D-Layer of the atmosphere to "protect"
satellites.
A link to an on-line version of that
article is posted here on eHam
[http://www.eham.net/articles/14596].
At first,
a few people (myself included) wonder about the article
since no one appears to have heard of the proposal
before. It turns out the proposal is real.
Several additional posts follow, both before
& after the ARRL posts information on their web
site... hold that thought... and outside of some
questions about GPS and the space station, and some
political commentary, nothing more is said.
Meanwhile, the ARRL posts an article about the
news story, fleshing it out with more information about
the study. This article later ends up in the weekly ARRL
Letter, and in turn is posted as a new item here on
eHam.
One individual, responding to the new
post, raises questions about the HAARP project (which is
directly related to information in both posts),
specifically questioning HAARP in particular and
secretive government research in general.
So:
NOW the ARRL is being blasted for being:
-- Alarmist
-- Alarmist Propaganda
-- Activist
--
Irresponsible
-- Out of touch with science
--
Spinning this to their own benefit to raise money
And my favorite, for letting such an "important"
news item (*gasp!*) SCROLL TO THE SECOND PAGE like a
routine news item. (Which it is.)
Have I got the
facts right here?
So tell me one thing, Chip,
Tim, Jonathan and Ronald? What would you guys be saying
if the ARRL had NOT mentioned this news item on their
web site or in the ARRL Letter?
A little on-line
research (which I did after reading the first article,
since I hadn't heard about this before) will show that
the original Telstar satellite is generally accepted as
being disabled by the after-effects of an early
upper-atmosphere nuclear experiment. So I don't think
it's out of the question for us amateurs to be concerned
with the possible effects of similar radiation
"treatments" of the lower ionosphere, especially in
consideration both of our own LEO satellites and of
related services that could be affected, like GPS
systems. Concern is one thing. Asking questions is one
thing. Trying to find out the facts, trying to find out
if this is just a "blue sky" theoretical paper or
something that someone wants to actually try, that's one
thing.
Blasting an organization that you, for
your own reasons, have chosen not to associate with for
bringing this information out in the open... that's
another thing.
How can you have an effective
voice if you're perceived as willing to twist anything
to your point of view? |
| |
| RE: 'Radiation Belt Remediation'
Plan Could Affect |
Reply
|
| by W9WHE-II
on August 21, 2006 |
Mail
this to a friend! |
"So tell me one thing, Chip, Tim, Jonathan
and Ronald? What would you guys be saying if the ARRL
had NOT mentioned this news item on their web site or in
the ARRL Letter"
We have pointed out how arrl is
once again being "alarmist". With all of arrl's
"technical prowess" (afterall, arrl knows more about
comm then Motorola, IBM and Matshusta combined) why
didn't arrl anaylize the technical merits of the story?
Because arrl would like nothing more then another "the
sky is falling" threat to ham radio. There is no longer
much CASH FLOW in the "BPL will end ham radio as we know
it" claim. Donations to fight BPL are beginning to dry
up. So arrl needs a new "threat" to kick-start CASH
FLOW!
Afterall, ONLY the mighty arrl can protect
us from the many threats to ham radio, right? ONLY the
mighty arrl has the abillity to influence the government
to protect the average ham, right?
Fooey.
When it comes to arrl, its time people start seeing
the Newington Boys Club for what it is. A fifedom of,
for and by a fraction of hams, for a fraction of hams.
|
| |
| RE: 'Radiation Belt Remediation'
Plan Could Affect |
Reply
|
| by W9WHE-II
on August 21, 2006 |
Mail
this to a friend! |
"Blasting an organization that you, for
your own reasons, have chosen not to associate with for
bringing this information out in the open... that's
another thing"
Let's keep to the facts, shall
we? I was an arrl member, but CANCELLED my membership,
based upon arrl's ham UN-friendly ajenda. Not because of
this latest alarmist article.
W9WHE
Proud to have CANCELLED my arrl membership! |
| |
| RE: 'Radiation Belt Remediation'
Plan Could Affect |
Reply
|
| by W9WHE-II
on August 21, 2006 |
Mail
this to a friend! |
"So I don't think it's out of the question
for us amateurs to be concerned with the possible
effects of similar radiation "treatments".....especially
in consideration .....of related services that could be
affected, like GPS systems"
So its up to hams to
be "concerned" about protecting the GPS system? I think
we hams can sleep securely at night knowing that the US
millitary, which relies upon the GPS system, will not
permit something to harm a system they so depend on,
don't you think?
|
| |
| 'Radiation Belt Remediation' Plan
Could Affect HF |
Reply
|
| by W1YW on
August 21, 2006 |
Mail
this to a friend! |
"So: NOW the ARRL is being blasted for
being:
-- Alarmist
-- Alarmist Propaganda
--
Activist
-- Irresponsible
-- Out of touch with
science
-- Spinning this to their own benefit to
raise money "
------------------------------------------------------
In some circumstances, these characterizations
appear to apply. My opinion. And I AM an ARRL member...
I do believe that the ARRL projects an image
which in many ways is alarmist and activist.
Irresponsible? Oh yes, IMO.
I think it
is important that members dissent with the ARRL
'official' positions, when said positions are untenable,
and there is no basis to assert that they represent the
majority wishes of the membership.
BPL is a good
case in point.
OTOH, there are some very good
things that the ARRL does, for example in education.
However, the real question is how the ARRL acts
on the best INTERESTS of Part 97 licensees... I think
they fail miserably in that regard in recent years.
And when we lose the 3300 MHz band, the ARRL
will not be there to stop it beforehand. My prediction.
73,
Chip W1YW |
| |
| 'Radiation Belt Remediation' Plan
Could Affect HF |
Reply
|
| by W1YW on
August 21, 2006 |
Mail
this to a friend! |
"So tell me one thing, Chip, Tim, Jonathan
and Ronald? What would you guys be saying if the ARRL
had NOT mentioned this news item on their web site or in
the ARRL Letter:
-----------------------------
I, for one, never saw it in the ARRL Letter. I
saw it as the MAIN NEWS ITEM on the www.ARRL.ORG web
page. It was the MAIN NEWS ITEM until it was pulled. Now
its about at the bottom.
Otherwise I would have
ignored it as being not only unimportant, but presented
as such.
PRESENTING IT TO THE WORLD AS **TOP
NEWS** IN HAMS CIRCLES was totally irresponsible.
OK?
Please don't misrepresent what I
said nor where I got my info.
Thanks.
Chip W1YW |
| |
| 'Radiation Belt Remediation' Plan
Could Affect HF |
Reply
|
| by W1YW on
August 21, 2006 |
Mail
this to a friend! |
?So its up to hams to be "concerned" about
protecting the GPS system..."
-----------------------------------
Well, no:-)!
W9WHE is right again!
|
| |
| 'Radiation Belt Remediation' Plan
Could Affect HF |
Reply
|
| by W1YW on
August 21, 2006 |
Mail
this to a friend! |
'Blasting an organization that you, for
your own reasons, have chosen not to associate with for
bringing this information out in the open... that's
another thing'
-------------------------
Informed and educated dissension applies here.
And I am most certainly "associated " with the
ARRL--I AM a member. But I am not blind. Nor stupid. Nor
do I think ANY organization needs to be worshipped. This
is not the Sierra Club, nor Greenpeace. Or PETA or ALF
for that matter.
I have been a member of the
ARRL for most of my 40 years in ham radio.
|
| |
| 'Radiation Belt Remediation' Plan
Could Affect HF |
Reply
|
| by W1YW on
August 22, 2006 |
Mail
this to a friend! |
"And my favorite, for letting such an
"important" news item (*gasp!*) SCROLL TO THE SECOND
PAGE like a routine news item. (Which it is.)"
-------------------------------------------------
OM, if you READ what has been said, you
will see that the ARRL.ORG web site FEATURED the story
as the TOP NEWS ITEM on the web site-- eventually it got
pulled from that spot and move down towards
oblivion--like being moved from front page column 1 in
the NYT to page 13 bottom section....
Which is
where it belonged in the FIRST place.
Does this
register? Please acknowledge..
73,
Chip W1YW
|
| |
| RE: 'Radiation Belt Remediation'
Plan Could Affect |
Reply
|
| by AE6RO
on August 22, 2006 |
Mail
this to a friend! |
W1YW:
Now that I've had a little Kalua
in my cuppa this morning it is making much more sense.
Or as the Russian might say,
"Nado peet vodku
ponimat!" ("One needs to drink vodka to understand.") Oh
no! Russian-speak!
But I digress. I don't know the
pros or cons of this system to save the oh-so-precious
satellites at the expense of the ionosphere and
terribly, terribly obsolet HF communications.
I now
realize there is a Much More Serious Conspiracy afoot!
There's this car that runs on Water, man! It runs on
water and it has an air cooled fiberglass engine and
THEY DON'T WANT YOU TO KNOW ABOUT IT!
Chip, it might
be in underground developement in the Negev right now!
But they don't want us to know!
73sssss, AE6RO
|
| | |
Email
Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions
on this article.
Subscribe!
My
Subscriptions
Subscriptions
Help
Other News Articles
 Amateur
Radio Hamfest Attracts Young and Old:
ISS
Crew, ARISS Team Troubleshooting Slow-Scan TV System:
Incumbent Section
Managers Overcome Re-Election Challenges:
Radio
Buffs Walking on Air:
Amateur
Radio Operator Co-Hosts TV Show:
|
